Winning a Lawsuit Against a Telecom Operator for Broadband Throttling

Background to the Dispute

• ⚠️ The speaker's elderly parents experienced severe broadband throttling, making basic communication like WeChat impossible.
• 💬 The telecom operator accused the parents of "illegal activity" (PCDN) without investigation and demanded they sign a "confession" agreement to restore service.

The Court Hearing Unfolds

• ⚖️ The telecom operator's legal team presented an eight-page defense focused on technical jargon and internal rules, not legal or contractual obligations.
• 🗓️ They falsely claimed an announcement about speed limits was issued on March 6th, a critical date in their defense.

Exposing Fabricated Evidence

• 🔍 The speaker presented speed test records (0.6 Mbps upload) and technician chat logs confirming the throttling.
• 🕵️‍♂️ A key piece of evidence was the operator's printed announcement, where the release date was precisely covered by their official seal.
• 📅 The speaker discovered the actual release date was March 28th, while throttling began on March 6th, revealing a post-dated announcement and an attempted cover-up.

Victory and Key Takeaways

• ✅ The speaker won the lawsuit against the world's top 500 company, demonstrating that ordinary individuals can challenge powerful corporations.
• 💡 The case highlighted how the operator resorted to deception and manipulation of evidence to avoid accountability.
• 🗣️ The speaker emphasized that "the law does not protect silent people" and encourages others to stand up against unfair practices.