UK Supreme Court to Hear 9/11 Twin Towers Controlled Demolition Case

Legal Challenge to 9/11 Findings

• 🏛️ The UK Supreme Court will hear a case challenging the official findings of what caused the collapse of the Twin Towers on 9/11.
• 👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 The case is brought by the family of Matt Campbell, a British citizen killed in the North Tower, who disputes the inquest's conclusion that the airplane impact caused the collapse.
• ⚖️ The family argues that the original inquest was insufficient, as it did not investigate how the towers came down, despite numerous British victims.

Attorney General's Role and Rejection

• 🚫 The UK Attorney General's office rejected the family's application to reopen the inquest, a decision the family is now challenging as unlawful.
• 📄 The family submitted thousands of pages of evidence, including eyewitness testimony and expert analysis, which the Attorney General reportedly dismissed as not credible without thorough review.
• 🏛️ The current legal battle focuses on whether the Attorney General's decisions are subject to judicial review by the courts.

Evidence for Controlled Demolition

• 💥 Visual evidence suggests the towers' collapse was near free-fall acceleration and involved outward destruction, with pulverized concrete and shattered steel ejected hundreds of feet.
• 🔥 Eyewitnesses reported seeing explosions, and molten metal was observed pouring from the South Tower before its collapse, indicating the use of incendiaries like thermite.
• 🔬 A scientific paper documented the discovery of unreacted nanothermite material in WTC dust samples, presented as evidence of the demolition agents used.

Legal Process and Public Support

• 💰 The Campbell family is crowdfunding to cover legal costs, needing approximately £8,000 to initiate the Supreme Court case, with more funds anticipated for attorney fees.
• 🤝 The public has consistently supported the family's fundraising efforts, described as a "David versus Goliath" situation.
• 📈 There is optimism that the Supreme Court will rule in favor of judicial review, potentially leading to a High Court decision that the Attorney General's rejection was unlawful.

Future Outlook and Call to Action

• 🌍 The case is seen as potentially monumental, with hopes that a favorable ruling will allow a proper investigation into the cause of the Twin Towers' destruction.
• 📢 Public sentiment is shifting, with increasing openness to questioning the official 9/11 narrative, and Matt Campbell's case is expected to garner further attention and support.
• 🌐 Donations can be made via a link on ic911.org, directing to Matt Campbell's crowdfunder page.