UAP Whistleblower Recalls Military Sighting and Lack of Official Documentation

UAP Sighting and Initial Reaction

• 💡 Dylan Borland, a former Air Force member with a clearance, recounted a UAP sighting that occurred in 2013.
• 💬 Borland shared that after discussing the event on the ops floor, some older enlisted personnel advised him to "keep that to yourself."

Lack of Official Documentation and Investigation

• ❓ Borland stated that to his knowledge, there was no official afteraction report, debrief, or documentation of the incident.
• ⚠️ He also noted that there was no apparent interest from command to investigate or verify what he saw.
• 🎯 When asked if others witnessed the event, Borland indicated that only security forces and those on duty would have been present, and he did not speak with them about it.

Government Involvement and Confusion

• 🧐 Borland's opinion is that the UAP sighting 100% involved the US government, despite the lack of official record.
• 🚀 He expressed confusion as to why these objects would operate near US bases or during training exercises, especially considering the high cost and sensitive nature of operations like $5 billion projects.
• ⚠️ Borland found it unlikely that the US government would accidentally allow such events to occur during critical operations.

Limited Interviews and Afteraction Reports

• 🔍 Borland mentioned that the only person interviewed about a UAP incident at Vandenberg during that timeframe was the one who witnessed the object land.
• 🤷 He found it odd that not everyone associated with sensitive, national security operations would be interviewed if an anomaly occurred.
• 📊 Chief Wiggins corroborated the lack of afteraction reports and investigations for similar incidents he was privy to in his Navy experience, stating that operations are typically deliberate and followed by reviews.