Trump vs. Newsom: National Guard Control Battle Continues in California

National Guard Control Dispute

• ⚖️ A federal judge initially ruled that President Trump likely violated the law by taking control of California's National Guard, ordering them back under Governor Newsom's control.
• 🚀 However, Trump's legal team filed an appeal, and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals granted a stay, allowing the troops to remain deployed in Los Angeles for now.
• 🗓️ A hearing is scheduled for June 17th to review the legal issues, with a decision not expected for at least a week or two, likely heading to the Supreme Court.

Differing Perspectives on the Ruling

• 🗣️ President Trump praised the appeals court decision, stating he used the National Guard to keep Los Angeles safe and prevent it from burning.
• 📢 Governor Newsom sharply criticized the decision, accusing Trump of admitting he plans to militarize other cities at will.

Legal and Constitutional Questions

• ❓ The core legal questions revolve around whether the judge overstepped his authority, how judges will interpret the law regarding rebellion vs. peaceful protest, and if the National Guard is necessary to execute federal law.
• ⚖️ The Trump administration's approach is characterized as acting first and litigating later, with the 10th Amendment and federal law being key considerations.

National Guard Deployment and ICE Raids

• 🛡️ The National Guard, supplemented by Marines, is currently guarding federal property and assisting ICE agents, not making arrests.
• ⏳ The ICE raids are continuing indefinitely, and the duration of the National Guard's presence is uncertain, potentially lasting 30 to 60 days or more.
• 🌍 The situation in Los Angeles is part of a broader context, with protests and events like 'No Kings Day' expected nationwide, alongside a presidential military parade in Washington D.C.