Trump Lawyer Mike Davis on Don Lemon, FACE Act, and Conspiracy Against Rights

Legal Strategy Against Don Lemon and "Clan Foot Soldiers"

• 🎯 Pam Bondi and Army Dylan are positioned as the new leadership at the Justice Department, ready to pursue indictments against "BLM terrorists" and agitators like Don Lemon.
• ⚖️ The legal strategy will focus on violations of the FACE Act (18 USC 248) and conspiracy against rights (18 USC 241), mirroring tactics used by the Biden administration against Christians.
• ⚠️ The speaker asserts that Don Lemon's actions at a Christian church constitute a violation of these acts, regardless of his identity or profession.

Weaponization of the Justice Department

• 🏛️ The Biden Justice Department is accused of politicizing and weaponizing its resources to target political enemies and protect allies, citing the FACE Act cases against praying Christians.
• 🚫 In contrast, the administration is accused of granting amnesty to those who desecrated Christian churches and synagogues.
• 🚨 The new leadership is expected to bring accountability for such perceived double standards.

Don Lemon's Actions and Legal Exposure

• 📰 Don Lemon is characterized as an agitator, not a journalist, whose own video evidence incriminates him.
• 📢 Lemon's statements about targeting "white people" and creating "trauma in the children" are highlighted as admissions of criminal intent.
• ⛓️ These admissions are seen as building a "slam dunk case" for FACE Act violations and conspiracy against rights, potentially leading to imprisonment.

The "Clan Statute" and Civil Rights

• 📜 The conspiracy against rights statute (18 USC 241), also known as the "clan statute," is discussed as a tool used against President Trump and now potentially against Don Lemon.
• ✊ This post-Civil War statute is intended to protect civil rights, and its application to Lemon is based on his alleged conspiracy to harass Christians and white people.
• ⚖️ The speaker argues that Lemon can be charged twice under this statute for targeting both Christians and white people, leading to significant legal trouble.

First Amendment Limitations

• 🚫 The argument that Don Lemon has a First Amendment right to trespass or disrupt church services is dismissed as invalid.
• ⛪ Church services are explicitly stated not to be public forums, and actions like disrupting them or trespassing are considered crimes, not protected speech.
• 🚨 The speaker emphasizes that even if Lemon were acting as a journalist, his actions would still be illegal under the FACE Act and conspiracy statutes.