Supreme Court Setbacks for Environmental Protections in Recent Term
Bloomberg PodcastsJuly 7, 202526 min210 views
31 connections·40 entities in this video→Supreme Court's Environmental Impact Score
- 🎯 On a scale of 1 to 10, the Supreme Court's impact on environmental protections this past term was a seven, indicating significant setbacks.
- ⚖️ While there were no single blockbuster decisions, a series of rulings collectively weakened federal environmental protections.
- 💡 A mixed bag, with some minor victories, such as denying review in climate cases like the Honolulu case and others brought by red state attorneys general.
NEPA and Indirect Impacts in Utah Railway Case
- 🚂 The biggest environmental decision involved a proposed Utah railway for transporting heavy crude oil, with questions about considering upstream extraction and downstream burning impacts under NEPA.
- 📉 The Supreme Court, in an 8-0 decision (with Gorsuch recused), overturned the DC Circuit's ruling, stating agencies don't need to consider indirect effects that are remote in space and time or beyond their regulatory authority.
- ⚠️ Justice Kavanaugh's opinion is seen as a
Knowledge graph40 entities · 31 connections
How they connect
An interactive map of every person, idea, and reference from this conversation. Hover to trace connections, click to explore.
Hover · drag to explore
40 entities
Chapters11 moments
Key Moments
Transcript99 segments
Full Transcript
Topics13 themes
What’s Discussed
Environmental LawSupreme CourtNEPAClean Water ActEPANational Environmental Policy ActIndirect ImpactsRegulatory AuthorityClean Air ActCalifornia WaiversNationwide InjunctionsClass ActionsEnvironmental Litigation
Smart Objects40 · 31 links
Companies· 8
Concepts· 13
Medias· 4
Locations· 4
People· 6
Products· 4
Event· 1