Retired FBI Agent on Canton Murder Investigations and Audit Concerns

Audit vs. Investigation

• 💡 A retired FBI agent, Robert D’Amico, discusses the inadequacy of an audit compared to a true police investigation.
• 🎯 Audits lack police powers, making it unlikely for officers to openly discuss potential conspiracies.
• 🔑 D’Amico emphasizes that investigations require the ability to place individuals under oath to ensure truthful testimony.

Concerns with Canton Investigations

• ⚠️ D’Amico expresses skepticism about the audit's findings, particularly regarding cases like Sandra Birchmore and Karen Read.
• 🔬 He highlights issues such as a leaf blower at a crime scene and a lack of proper documentation, suggesting a failure to properly process evidence.
• 🚨 In the Sandra Birchmore case, the transcript mentions allegations of sexual assault by three police officers before her death, which D'Amico implies was not adequately addressed.

Crime Scene Analysis

• 🧐 D’Amico questions the medical examiner's conclusion in the Birchmore case, noting the lack of a broken hyoid bone and the unusual detail of her hanging from a door handle.
• 🔍 He states that even without forensic training, one could identify significant questions at such a crime scene.

"Judeo-Christian Principled" Firm

• 🤔 D’Amico voices suspicion about the firm hired by the city, Five Stones Intelligence, due to its self-description as "Judeo-Christian principled."
• 🚩 He found their practices in previous dealings to be sloppy and questionable, impacting their credibility.
• ⚖️ D’Amico believes the firm's own findings in these cases, which he deems basic, further damage their reputation.