Rendlesham Forest Incident: Lt. Col. Charles Halt Responds to Larry Warren's Claims

Halt's Rebuttal to Larry Warren

• 💡 Lt. Col. Charles Halt refutes Larry Warren's claims of being present in Rendlesham Forest on the night of December 27-28, 1980.
• 🎯 Halt states Warren was not there and was instead drinking at a party in the dormitory, upset about missing the event.
• ⚠️ Halt also disputes claims made by Steve Longero, stating that Longero, as part of C Flight, was assigned to the Weapons Storage Area (WSA) and could not have left.

The First Night's Investigation

• 🌲 On the first night, personnel including Penniston, Burrows, and Cabanac investigated unexplained lights in the forest.
• 🚀 Penniston and Burrows reported encountering what they described as a craft.
• radio communication issues and differing accounts from Penniston and Burrows highlight the complexity and inconsistencies in early reports.

Halt's Account of the Third Night

• 🌌 Halt recounts being called to investigate lights in the forest on what he believes was the third night of the incident.
• ☢️ Upon arriving at a suspected landing site, Halt and his team detected elevated radiation readings around indentations in the ground and on nearby trees.
• ✨ A glowing orange, oval object was observed in a farmer's field, described as winking and shedding sparks, which then moved into the forest.

C5 Aircraft and DOE Involvement

• ✈️ A C5 military cargo aircraft landed at Woodbridge base days after the incident, with unmarked crew providing their own security.
• ❓ Halt speculated this might be Department of Energy (DOE) personnel conducting a special inspection due to the unusual circumstances.
• ⚠️ The aircraft arrived after the main Rendlesham incident, ruling out its direct involvement in the initial events.

Photographic Evidence and Cover-up Allegations

• 📸 Sergeant Monroe Neville attempted to photograph the object and the site with a Nikon F2 camera using high-speed film, but the film reportedly came out fogged.
• 🕵️ Halt believes the radiation levels were insufficient to fog the film, suggesting potential interference or a darkroom error.
• 🤐 Halt asserts he was never told to