Raskin and McClintock Clash Over Epstein Files and Trump Derangement Syndrome

Raskin's Amendment on Epstein Files

• 💡 Jamie Raskin proposed an amendment to a bill, stating it should not take effect until all Epstein files are released.
• 🎯 He framed this as a test of whether Republican colleagues are serious about protecting children from trafficking and exploitation.
• 📌 The amendment text is the same as a discharge petition supported by all Democrats and four Republicans.

Evidence from Epstein's Files

• 🔍 The Oversight Committee received Epstein's 50th birthday book, including a note and drawing that President Trump denied existed.
• ✍️ Trump reportedly sued The Wall Street Journal for $10 billion over reporting on this note, which appears to be signed by Trump.
• ⚠️ The book also contains images potentially depicting Epstein grooming young girls and a document joking about selling a woman to Donald Trump.

Accusations of Corruption and Cover-up

• ⚖️ Raskin argued that the Epstein case highlights corruption, where the wealthy and powerful manipulate the justice system.
• 🚨 He criticized the plea bargain given to Epstein by Alex Acosta, calling it a "sweetheart contract" that avoided federal charges for child sex trafficking.
• 🗣️ Raskin asserted that the public, across the political spectrum, wants transparency and accountability regarding the Epstein files.

McClintock's Objection and Raskin's Response

• 🚫 Tom McClintock objected to Raskin's amendment, calling it "Trump derangement syndrome" and irrelevant to immigration law.
• 💬 Raskin countered that he doesn't know what "deranged Trump syndrome" is and that the amendment is completely material and relevant to child protection.
• 🎤 Raskin challenged opponents to state directly if they do not want the files released, rather than arguing irrelevance.