Proof of Todd Blanch's Involvement in Prosecuting Abrego Revealed

New Evidence in Abrego Case

• 📌 The Abrego docket has revealed sealed proceedings and redacted documents related to a potential vindictive prosecution.
• 💡 Judge Krenshaw previously found a likelihood of vindictiveness in the charges against Abrego, aimed at affecting his return to the US and halting discovery.
• 🎯 A key piece of evidence is a statement by Todd Blanch on Fox News, suggesting the investigation into Abrego began after a Maryland judge questioned his deportation.

Government Deception Alleged

• 🤥 The Department of Justice has repeatedly claimed the decision to prosecute Abrego was solely made by US Attorney Maguire, a claim now alleged to be false.
• ⚖️ Defense attorneys argue that numerous government lawyers misled the court, the defense, and the public about Maguire's role as the sole decision-maker.
• 📄 Documents, pried loose through discovery, reportedly show Todd Blanch's involvement in charging Abrego, contradicting the government's previous statements.

Implications for the Case

• 📉 Abrego's legal team is using this evidence to argue for dismissal of charges, citing vindictive and selective prosecution.
• 🔍 The defense aims to question Todd Blanch, who has been attempting to quash a subpoena, asserting he has no connection to the decision-making process.
• 🔑 If the motion for vindictive prosecution succeeds, it could lead to the dismissal of the criminal case.

Costa Rica Deportation Standoff

• ✈️ The government is preventing Abrego's deportation to Costa Rica, despite his willingness to self-deport.
• ⚠️ This refusal by the government is cited by Abrego's attorneys as further evidence of vindictive prosecution.
• 🔒 Redacted communications between Todd Blanch and other officials are central to the ongoing legal battle, with the government claiming privilege.