Skip to main content

New Reporting Challenges Washington Post Narrative on Hegseth's "Second Strike"

Megyn KellyDecember 2, 202513 min128,504 views
20 connections·30 entities in this video→

Doubts Cast on Washington Post Report

  • πŸ“° A new report, particularly from the New York Times, is casting significant doubt on the Washington Post's narrative regarding Secretary Hegseth's order concerning a "second strike" on a boat.
  • 🎯 The Washington Post headline suggested Hegseth ordered "kill them all" after two survivors clung to a burning ship, implying a direct order to eliminate survivors.
  • ❓ The New York Times, citing five anonymous US officials, reports that Hegseth's order was to destroy the boat and its cargo, a standard order where casualties are expected, not a specific command to kill survivors after the fact.

Analysis of Military Orders and Rules of Engagement

  • βš–οΈ Professor Brian Cox explains that even if Hegseth directed the destruction of the boat, this is distinct from an order to take no prisoners or kill all survivors.
  • ⚠️ Under the law of armed conflict, troops are trained not to attack individuals who are out of the fight due to sickness, injury, or detention, including shipwreck survivors.
  • 🎯 However, if a vessel is only disabled and not fully destroyed, it can still be considered a military objective, making personnel on board not officially "shipwrecked" and thus potentially subject to further strikes if the mission is to destroy the vessel.

Intercepted Communications and Justification for Second Strike

  • πŸ“ž The New York Times report includes information that US military intercepted radio communications from one of the survivors to suspected narco-traffickers.
  • ⚑ This intelligence suggests the survivors might have been attempting to coordinate backup, providing a clear military justification for a second strike to ensure the boat was destroyed and prevent further enemy action.
  • 🀝 Professor Cox argues that such intelligence would lead any military commander to order further strikes, as the objective was to destroy the boat, and it was not yet achieved.

Media Literacy and Narrative Framing

  • 🧠 The discussion highlights the importance of media literacy when evaluating anonymous sources and speculative reporting, especially concerning accusations of war crimes.
  • πŸ—£οΈ The narrative presented by some media outlets is contrasted with the actions of rational, considered military leaders who understand combat rules.
  • πŸ“’ Secretary Hegseth's tweet supporting Admiral Bradley, who made the call for the second strike, is seen as a clarification that the order to destroy the boat was standard, and Admiral Bradley acted appropriately based on the situation and intelligence.

Product Spotlight: Masa Chips

  • πŸ₯‘ Masa chips are highlighted as a healthier alternative to conventional chips, made with only three ingredients: organic corn, sea salt, and grass-fed beef tallow.
  • βœ… They are presented as a satisfying and energizing snack without the negative effects of seed oils, MSG, or artificial ingredients found in many commercial chips.
  • πŸ›’ Both Masa chips and Vandy crisps (a sister company) offer a 25% discount with code MK at masachips.com or vandycrisps.com, and are available at Sprouts supermarkets.
Knowledge graph30 entities Β· 20 connections

How they connect

An interactive map of every person, idea, and reference from this conversation. Hover to trace connections, click to explore.

Hover Β· drag to explore
30 entities
Chapters7 moments

Key Moments

Transcript51 segments

Full Transcript

Topics14 themes

What’s Discussed

Washington PostNew York TimesSecretary HegsethLaw of Armed ConflictMilitary ObjectivesRules of EngagementWar CrimesIntercepted CommunicationsNarco-traffickersMedia LiteracyAnonymous SourcesMilitary StrategyMasa ChipsVandy Crisps
Smart Objects30 Β· 20 links
CompaniesΒ· 5
ConceptsΒ· 8
PeopleΒ· 6
MediasΒ· 7
EventsΒ· 3
ProductΒ· 1