New Facts Emerge Debunking Official January 6 Pipe Bomb Narrative

Pipe Bomb Timers and Inconsistencies

• ⏱️ The official narrative that pipe bombs were placed and armed on the evening of January 5th is challenged by new FBI lab reports.
• 💡 The FBI lab report indicates the pipe bombs only had a 60-minute egg timer, making it impossible for them to have been armed the night before.
• 📍 A witness consistent testimony states there were still 20 minutes left on the egg timer when the device was found, suggesting it was placed much closer to the time of discovery.

Disappearing Data and FirstNet

• 🕵️‍♂️ The investigation into the pipe bombs is complicated by mysteriously disappeared data from AT&T, the only carrier that did not initially provide requested cell phone data.
• 🚨 AT&T claimed the FBI corrupted the data, while the FBI stated AT&T did. The data was related to individuals in the vicinity of the pipe bomb locations.
• ❓ Suspicion arises as AT&T directed the FBI to FirstNet, a service for law enforcement and first responders that sits on AT&T's backbone, for the data, which was reportedly about to be deleted.

Questions About Data Integrity

• 💻 The speaker, with 20 years in IT, questions AT&T's claim of data corruption, stating data is rarely truly deleted and is often archived.
• 💾 Other carriers reportedly keep data from significant events for extended periods, even from decades ago, making the alleged AT&T data loss unusual.
• 📍 The precise location data from cell towers around the pipe bomb sites is crucial, and its alleged corruption is a significant point of contention.

Viability of the Pipe Bombs

• 💣 The FBI lab report did not use the word "viable" when describing the pipe bombs, only stating they contained explosive components, not necessarily enough for a massive explosion.
• 🐕 A bomb-sniffing dog from the Secret Service did not detect the pipe bomb when walking nearby, raising questions about its presence or viability at that time.
• 🚶‍♂️ Videos show law enforcement allowing people to walk very close to the devices, suggesting they may not have been considered viable threats, potentially indicating a training exercise or the use of non-viable devices.