Skip to main content

Mary Robinson Speaker Series 2025 | Big Tech vs. the public good: how human rights can detoxify tech

[HPP] Mary RobinsonSeptember 15, 20251h 31min
17 connections·40 entities in this video

The Challenge of Big Tech and Public Good

  • 💡 Tech companies hold dominant power, leading to widespread abuse without accountability due to business models focused on market dominance and shareholder returns.
  • ⚠️ Harms include privacy infringements, coercive algorithms, addictive content, hate speech, undermining democracy, and ballooning greenhouse gas emissions, exacerbated by generative AI.
  • 🎯 These issues are not "glitches" but rather features of the current business model, deliberately designed for profit maximization.

Emancipatory Potential of Technology

  • 🌱 Despite the harms, technology possesses extraordinary emancipatory potential to enhance knowledge, foster democratic debate, and connect movements across borders.
  • 🚀 A responsible tech sector can aid in freeing workers from drudgery, drive shared prosperity, and help confront global challenges like the climate and nature crisis.
  • ✅ This positive future requires deliberate action and smart regulation, not corporate benevolence or belated reactions to harm.

The Imperative for Smart Regulation

  • 🔑 Smart regulation, grounded in human rights and environmental due diligence, is essential to direct tech companies towards the public good.
  • ⚖️ Examples like the EU's Digital Services Act and Brazil's regulatory moves demonstrate that regulation can make innovation safe, inclusive, and sustainable.
  • 🛡️ Companies must anticipate risks, prevent and mitigate harm, and be transparent and accountable for their technologies' impacts across value chains.

Roles of Key Stakeholders

  • 🏛️ Governments must protect national sovereignty and balance dignity with economic advancement, while judiciaries safeguard rights and hold tech accountable.
  • 💰 Investors have a crucial role in encouraging human rights due diligence, despite challenges like dual-class share structures that limit influence.
  • 🗣️ Civil society, researchers, journalists, and labor unions are vital in advocating for change, exposing harms, and testing legal frameworks.
  • 🌍 Users must evolve into active citizens, leveraging their collective power to demand better protections, algorithms, and responsible business decisions.

Pathways to a Rights-Respecting Tech Future

  • 🛠️ Companies like Proton demonstrate that privacy and security by design and ethical business models are viable alternatives to data exploitation.
  • 🤝 International collaboration, strategic litigation, and strong alliances between governments, civil society, and responsible businesses are necessary to challenge concentrated power.
  • 📈 The focus must shift from unchecked growth to quality growth that prioritizes human dignity and security, with regulation driving the right kind of innovation.
Knowledge graph40 entities · 17 connections

How they connect

An interactive map of every person, idea, and reference from this conversation. Hover to trace connections, click to explore.

Hover · drag to explore
40 entities
Chapters20 moments

Key Moments

Transcript332 segments

Full Transcript

Topics15 themes

What’s Discussed

Big TechHuman RightsDigital RightsAccountabilityRegulationGenerative AIBusiness ModelsPrivacy InfringementsDue DiligenceStrategic LitigationContent ModerationDual-Class Share StructuresInteroperabilityAlgorithmic TransparencyMultilateralism
Smart Objects40 · 17 links
Companies· 17
People· 6
Locations· 2
Concepts· 11
Product· 1
Events· 2
Media· 1