Mark Levin Exposes the 'Silent Coup' Against Donald Trump

Uncovering the 'Silent Coup'

• 💡 Mark Levin details his discovery of a coordinated effort to smear Donald Trump, starting on March 3rd, 2017, using publicly available information and media reports.
• 🎯 He identified a pattern of leaks originating from the Department of Justice, FBI, CIA, and potentially the White House, aimed at damaging Trump's campaign and presidency.
• 📌 Levin, drawing on his experience as a former chief of staff to an attorney general, recognized these leaks as evidence of a "silent coup" against the elected president.

Media Collusion and Public Record

• 📰 Levin highlights how media outlets like The Washington Post and The New York Times published stories based on these planted leaks, often with sensational headlines like "Wiretap."
• 🤝 He argues that the media colluded with Obama-Biden administration officials, amplifying the narrative to damage Trump.
• 🔍 His investigation was based solely on the public record, piecing together disparate news reports to reveal the underlying pattern.

The Crucial Point: Interference and Undermining

• 🚀 The core of Levin's argument is that the "Russia hoax" was not just about Russia, but about concocting and using information to interfere with the presidential election and undermine Trump's presidency.
• ⚠️ The crucial point, he stresses, is that these actions were designed to prevent Donald Trump from being elected and then to hinder his effectiveness as president.
• 🗣️ Levin emphasizes that subsequent investigations, committees, and special counsels all stemmed from this initial effort to sabotage Trump.

Tulsi Gabbard's Document Release

• 📄 Recent releases by Tulsi Gabbard are presented as providing undeniable evidence of the Obama-Biden administration's actions against Trump.
• 🧩 These documents reportedly contain detailed information with "fingerprints and DNA" (metaphorically) on the Biden regime's attempts to sabotage President Trump.
• 🚫 Despite the new information, Levin notes that some analysts and Democrats attempt to dismiss it by claiming the "Russia stuff" was already known, missing the central point of government interference.