Levittown Episode 4: Prosecutors Grapple with Deepfake Legality
Bloomberg PodcastsMarch 28, 202526 min177 views
30 connections·40 entities in this video→The Arrest of Patrick Kerry
- detective Timothy Ingram made an arrest in the Levittown deep fake case after an 8-month investigation.
- The suspect, Patrick Kerry, was identified by several young women who knew him from high school.
- Kerry confessed to creating and posting explicit content of his high school peers online, admitting, "Yeah, it was me. I did it."
Prosecutorial Challenges
- Prosecutors Melissa Scanel and Kelsey Laura faced the challenge of determining if Kerry's actions constituted a crime, particularly a felony.
- They noted that while his behavior was awful, it was unclear if it was criminal under existing New York law, especially concerning "artistic expression" protected by the First Amendment.
- The legal team had a 90-day window to file charges before the risk of dismissal.
Kerry's Confession and Motivation
- In his confession, Kerry stated he was driven by boredom and addiction to internet pornography, seeking a thrill from causing fear and embarrassment to his victims.
- He described a cycle of thrill-seeking, guilt, and remorse, eventually apologizing for the suffering caused.
- Kerry was active on the website since 2019, posting personal information and encouraging other users to harass the women.
Deepfake Technology and Evolution
- The website hosted manipulated images, initially using photo editing apps, but evolved with the rise of deepfake technology.
- The transcript details the emergence of deepfakes, starting with celebrity face-swapping and progressing to more sophisticated AI algorithms.
- This technological advancement outpaced the law, making it difficult to prosecute.
Felony Charges and Legal Hurdles
- Prosecutors struggled to find a felony charge that fit Kerry's actions, as many posts involved misdemeanor harassment and obscenity violations.
- They eventually found grounds for a felony charge based on a real, non-consensual nude photo of a 14-year-old victim, which qualified as child sexual abuse material and revenge porn.
- Kerry was indicted on felony charges including promoting a sexual performance by a child, aggravated harassment, and stalking, but not for the deepfake images themselves.
Lingering Issues and Jurisdiction
- Despite Kerry's indictment and guilty plea, the website remained online, exposing victims to further danger.
- Prosecutors lacked the jurisdiction to take down the website as it was not hosted in the United States.
- The episode highlights the limitations of law enforcement in addressing cybercrime due to resources, borders, and jurisdiction.
Knowledge graph40 entities · 30 connections
How they connect
An interactive map of every person, idea, and reference from this conversation. Hover to trace connections, click to explore.
Hover · drag to explore
40 entities
Chapters10 moments
Key Moments
Transcript96 segments
Full Transcript
Topics14 themes
What’s Discussed
DeepfakesCybercrimeNon-consensual pornographyRevenge pornChild sexual abuse materialFirst AmendmentFelony chargesMisdemeanorJurisdictionArtificial IntelligenceDigital ForensicsLaw EnforcementOnline HarassmentLevittown
Smart Objects40 · 30 links
People· 13
Medias· 10
Company· 1
Concepts· 12
Events· 3
Product· 1