Lauren Boebert: 'No Rogue Rulings Act' to Combat Judicial Tyranny Against Trump

Support for the No Rogue Rulings Act

• 🎯 Rep. Lauren Boebert rises in support of the No Rogue Rulings Act, describing it as a necessary measure against activist judges.
• 🏛️ She argues these judges are obstructing President Donald J. Trump's agenda and the will of the American people.

Judicial Obstruction of Trump's Agenda

• ⚡ Boebert highlights that President Trump received a mandate in November 2024 to secure borders, shrink bureaucracy, and prioritize America.
• ⚖️ Despite over 100 executive orders in three months, unelected judges have issued nationwide injunctions, halting actions on deportations, wasteful spending, and border security.
• 🚫 She criticizes these rulings as attempts to tie the hands of the president trying to protect America.

Judicial Tyranny and Constitutional Checks

• 💥 Boebert labels the judicial actions as "judicial tyranny" rather than justice, questioning why a single unelected judge can override the votes of 80 million Americans.
• 📜 She asserts that the founding fathers intended for Congress to check the courts, and it is time to exercise that power.

Case Example: Judge Borsid's Ruling

• 🚢 As an example, she cites Judge James Borsid's ruling that halted deportations of Venezuelan gang members, invoking a law from 1798.
• 🧐 Boebert questions a single judge's authority to override the President's decision on national security matters.

Reclaiming Government Power

• ✊ The congresswoman supports the bill, introduced by Mr. Isa, as a means to take government back from bureaucrats and unelected judges.