Justice Thomas Questions Trump's Tariffs and the Trading with the Enemy Act
Forbes Breaking NewsNovember 7, 20252 min111,596 views
7 connectionsΒ·13 entities in this videoβDelegation Doctrine in Foreign Context
- ποΈ The non-delegation doctrine is argued to not apply with the same force in the foreign context as it does domestically.
- π Citing Dames and Moore, the court has indicated that strict limitations on delegation in the internal context do not apply in the external context.
- π This is because the President has inherent authority to address foreign emergencies, and Congress can confer tools to expand this capacity.
Historical Basis for Tariff Powers
- π The Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 deliberately evoked the historical use of presidential tariff powers, especially in wartime.
- π The power to regulate importation, as codified in the Act, essentially codifies an inherent presidential power.
- π When this power was expanded to peacetime in 1933, the meaning of the language to "regulate importation" remained the same.
- π This interpretation is reinforced by historical cases showing broad delegations of power to tariff and regulate foreign commerce, dating back to the founding era.
Knowledge graph13 entities Β· 7 connections
How they connect
An interactive map of every person, idea, and reference from this conversation. Hover to trace connections, click to explore.
Hover Β· drag to explore
13 entities
Chapters2 moments
Key Moments
Transcript11 segments
Full Transcript
Topics11 themes
Whatβs Discussed
Justice Clarence ThomasTrump TariffsDOJ LawyerTrading with the Enemy ActSupreme Court HearingDelegation DoctrineForeign ContextInherent Presidential AuthorityTariff PowerRegulation of ImportationForeign Commerce
Smart Objects13 Β· 7 links
PeopleΒ· 2
MediasΒ· 5
EventsΒ· 4
ConceptsΒ· 2