Skip to main content

Justice Jackson Questions Sliding Scale Test in Case v. Montana

Forbes Breaking NewsNovember 7, 20251 min8,622 views
2 connections·3 entities in this video→

The Brigham City Test and Sliding Scale

  • βš–οΈ Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson questioned whether the attorney agreed that the degree of certainty can vacillate under the Brigham City test.
  • 🎯 The attorney confirmed this, stating that the sliding scale is indeed the mechanism for this vacillation.

Flexibility in Legal Standards

  • πŸ’‘ The core argument is that there isn't a fixed quantum of certainty regarding danger that must apply in every case.
  • πŸ” The amount and reliability of information, along with corroboration, are key factors that can differ between cases.
  • πŸ“Š These factors influence the level of certainty an officer needs to make an entry reliable.

Clarifying the Sliding Scale Metaphor

  • 🧩 The attorney clarified that the sliding scale is a metaphor, not a strictly formulaic matrix.
  • 🧠 It relates to the severity of the situation and the amount of information available, but not in a rigid, predefined way.
Knowledge graph3 entities Β· 2 connections

How they connect

An interactive map of every person, idea, and reference from this conversation. Hover to trace connections, click to explore.

Hover Β· drag to explore
3 entities
Chapters1 moments

Key Moments

Transcript4 segments

Full Transcript

Topics9 themes

What’s Discussed

Brigham City testSliding ScaleCase v. MontanaDegree of CertaintyProbable CauseReasonable SuspicionLegal StandardsInformation ReliabilityCorroboration
Smart Objects3 Β· 2 links
PeopleΒ· 2
ConceptΒ· 1