Justice Jackson Questions Sliding Scale Test in Case v. Montana
Forbes Breaking NewsNovember 7, 20251 min8,622 views
2 connectionsΒ·3 entities in this videoβThe Brigham City Test and Sliding Scale
- βοΈ Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson questioned whether the attorney agreed that the degree of certainty can vacillate under the Brigham City test.
- π― The attorney confirmed this, stating that the sliding scale is indeed the mechanism for this vacillation.
Flexibility in Legal Standards
- π‘ The core argument is that there isn't a fixed quantum of certainty regarding danger that must apply in every case.
- π The amount and reliability of information, along with corroboration, are key factors that can differ between cases.
- π These factors influence the level of certainty an officer needs to make an entry reliable.
Clarifying the Sliding Scale Metaphor
- π§© The attorney clarified that the sliding scale is a metaphor, not a strictly formulaic matrix.
- π§ It relates to the severity of the situation and the amount of information available, but not in a rigid, predefined way.
Knowledge graph3 entities Β· 2 connections
How they connect
An interactive map of every person, idea, and reference from this conversation. Hover to trace connections, click to explore.
Hover Β· drag to explore
3 entities
Chapters1 moments
Key Moments
Transcript4 segments
Full Transcript
Topics9 themes
Whatβs Discussed
Brigham City testSliding ScaleCase v. MontanaDegree of CertaintyProbable CauseReasonable SuspicionLegal StandardsInformation ReliabilityCorroboration
Smart Objects3 Β· 2 links
PeopleΒ· 2
ConceptΒ· 1