Skip to main content

John Solomon on FBI Media Spin and Pulitzer-Winning Russiagate Reporting

Megyn KellyAugust 13, 202517 min209,575 views
35 connections·40 entities in this video→

FBI Media Manipulation and Russiagate Reporting

  • 🎯 Michael Schmidt of the New York Times, a recipient of Pulitzer Prizes for his Russiagate reporting, is highlighted for his role in disseminating information from the FBI.
  • πŸ’‘ The discussion questions the integrity of reporting that concluded there was no wrongdoing in the Russiagate investigations, especially when key figures like Schmidt are brought on to downplay the story.
  • πŸ” John Solomon contrasts his own reporting experience with that of Michael Schmidt, emphasizing that the FBI initially told him there was "no there there" regarding collusion.
  • πŸ“„ Solomon points out that the New York Times published a story in February 2017 claiming US intelligence had proof of Trump campaign-Russia communication, a story that has never been retracted despite James Comey later stating it wasn't true.

Media Accountability and Retractions

  • πŸ“° Solomon criticizes the New York Times and Washington Post for not retracting stories that have since been proven false, contrasting this with historical journalistic standards where errors were corrected.
  • ⚠️ He references Jeff Girth's re-evaluation in the Columbia Journalism Review, which detailed reporting failures by the New York Times and Washington Post regarding Russia.
  • 🧐 The NSA Director Mike Rogers reportedly stated in an FBI interview that a Pulitzer-winning Washington Post story, claiming Trump made an incriminating statement to him, was "wrong."
  • πŸ—£οΈ Solomon argues that while receiving classified leaks doesn't make a reporter bad, failing to correct inaccurate reporting does.

DNC Hack and Exfiltration Nuances

  • πŸ“§ While John Podesta's emails are widely believed to have been hacked by Russians, the DNC hack is presented as more complex.
  • 🚫 The FBI, under James Comey, did not demand DNC servers but used a vendor, CrowdStrike, for analysis.
  • ❓ CrowdStrike's analysis indicated Russians gained access and performed probing, but could never prove exfiltration of data, meaning they couldn't confirm emails were pulled off the servers.
  • πŸ“Š This distinction between hacking into systems and successfully exfiltrating data is crucial for understanding the reporting on the DNC hack.
Knowledge graph40 entities Β· 35 connections

How they connect

An interactive map of every person, idea, and reference from this conversation. Hover to trace connections, click to explore.

Hover Β· drag to explore
40 entities
Chapters9 moments

Key Moments

Transcript66 segments

Full Transcript

Topics13 themes

What’s Discussed

RussiagateFBINew York TimesWashington PostPulitzer PrizesJohn SolomonMichael SchmidtJames ComeyDNC HackCrowdStrikeExfiltrationMedia BiasJournalism Ethics
Smart Objects40 Β· 35 links
CompaniesΒ· 12
PeopleΒ· 11
EventsΒ· 5
MediasΒ· 8
ConceptsΒ· 3
ProductΒ· 1