Jason Goodman: New Video Evidence Suggests Charlie Kirk Was Shot From Behind

Analysis of Charlie Kirk Shooting Video Evidence

• 💡 Jason Goodman presents new video evidence suggesting Charlie Kirk was shot from behind, contradicting the official account of a front-facing high-powered rifle shot.
• 🎯 The official story posits a high-powered .306 rifle round, which experts claim would cause a significant "blowout" exit wound, unlike the small hole observed.
• 🔍 Goodman's analysis focuses on a video originally presented at 20 frames per second (fps), which he claims was derived from a 240 fps original, with frames selectively dropped to create a 20 fps and 30 fps version.

Technical Breakdown of Video Evidence

• 🔬 Digital Imaging Expertise: Goodman, with a background in visual effects for major motion pictures, scrutinizes the video's technical specifications, noting it's encoded in a high 10 format, not typical for iPhones.
• 🧩 The analysis highlights three distinct dots in the video, forming a line, which Goodman alleges represents a low muzzle velocity projectile traveling towards Charlie Kirk's head.
• 🚀 He hypothesizes this projectile, possibly from an air rifle or air pistol traveling around 500 feet per second, caused the observed disruption and injury.

Explaining the "Crack Thump" Discrepancy

• ⚠️ Goodman addresses the acoustic analysis, or "crack thump" calculations, which suggest a supersonic rifle round.
• 🛠️ He proposes that a digital trigger technology could allow for simultaneous firing of a low-velocity projectile and a supersonic rifle round from a distant location, creating the acoustic illusion.
• 📍 The presence of a tunnel behind Kirk's seating area is noted as a potential hiding spot for an individual using such synchronized firing technology.

Suppression and Further Investigation

• 🚫 Goodman claims his findings are being suppressed, with his posts on X (formerly Twitter) receiving "sensitive content" warnings.
• 💰 He has offered a $100 reward to anyone who can refute his presented facts, emphasizing that his analysis is based on existing technologies and empirical evidence.
• 📸 The investigation points to a photographer present at the scene who may possess higher-resolution footage of the original event, potentially clarifying the projectile's origin and trajectory.