Eric Swalwell Questions Newt Gingrich on Trump's Third Term Constitutionality

Impeachment Stunt and Judicial Overreach

• 🎯 Representative Swalwell criticizes a Congressman for introducing an impeachment resolution as a fundraising ploy, noting that no witnesses or colleagues support impeachment of judges.
• 💡 Swalwell challenges the Congressman to bring a privilege resolution for an actual debate, offering to contribute to his campaign if he does.
• ⚖️ Swalwell questions Newt Gingrich about judges who issue nationwide injunctions, citing examples like suspending abortion pill approval and ruling against ACA protections for LGBTQ individuals.

Gingrich's Stance on Judicial Rulings

• 🎤 Gingrich states he has not spoken out on specific judicial cases until invited to testify, having written about the system being "out of whack" in 2011.
• 🗣️ He clarifies that his generic statement about not commenting included all cases Swalwell wished to ask about.

Constitutionality of a Third Trump Term

• ❓ Swalwell directly asks Gingrich if a third Trump term would be constitutional.
• 📜 Gingrich responds that without a constitutional amendment passed by Congress and ratified by states, a third term would be impossible.
• ✅ He acknowledges that if such a constitutional change were enacted, Trump would have the option to run for re-election.