Epstein Files: Missing FBI Interviews and Disputed Letter Authenticity

Missing FBI Interviews on Trump Accuser

• 🔍 A bombshell report by Roger Sullenberger reveals that the DOJ and FBI may be covering up missing interview materials related to a Donald Trump sexual assault accuser in the Epstein files.
• 🗓️ This individual, who accused Donald Trump of sexual assault, was interviewed at least four times by the FBI and DOJ in 2019, according to internet archive screenshots of witness material.
• ⚠️ Most of the material from these interviews, including FBI 302s, interview notes, and photographs, is currently missing, despite the individual being deemed credible enough for multiple interviews.
• 💰 The accuser was also potentially involved in a settlement agreement with the Epstein estate, further highlighting the significance of these missing documents.

Epstein-Nasser Letter Controversy

• ✉️ The MeidasTouch Network previously reported on a letter allegedly sent from Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Nasser, postmarked days after Epstein's death, which the DOJ initially claimed was fake.
• 🔬 The FBI's initial conclusion that the letter was fake was based on claims that the writing didn't match Epstein's and postmark inconsistencies.
• 🔄 However, a later FBI lab report from September 2020 contradicted this, stating they could not conduct meaningful handwriting comparisons due to a lack of sufficient verified writing samples from Epstein.

FBI Officials' Shifting Narrative

• 🎙️ Kash Patel and Dan Bongino, both with FBI backgrounds, co-hosted a podcast where they discussed the difficulty of FBI work but avoided mentioning the Epstein files.
• 🎭 The speaker suggests that these individuals, who built their careers talking about Epstein and alleged cover-ups, are now engaged in a cover-up themselves by sidestepping the current revelations.
• 🗣️ Patel and Bongino focused on their past efforts, including claims of destroying Antifa, rather than addressing the new Epstein file information that the public is interested in.

Right-Wing Reactions to Revelations

• 💬 Even some right-wing commentators, like Dave Smith, acknowledge that the Epstein files' revelations are damaging to Donald Trump, regardless of direct evidence of his involvement.
• 🚨 These commentators suggest that Trump's alleged attempts to cover up or deny the existence of the Epstein files are problematic in themselves.
• 🤝 Another right-wing podcaster,