Election Integrity Expert Claims 2024 Election Manipulated

Election Integrity Concerns

• 💡 Nathan Taylor, Executive Director of Public Engagement for the Election Truth Alliance (ETA), discusses concerns about the 2024 election.
• 🎯 The ETA, comprised of individuals with backgrounds in statistics, finance, political science, and computer science, aims to verify and validate election processes.
• 🔑 Their approach involves applying statistical methods, similar to those used in finance and engineering, to detect potential non-human or abnormal voting behavior that could indicate manipulation.

Statistical Analysis of Elections

• 🔬 The ETA utilizes statistical techniques, drawing on the work of experts like Peter Clemm and Dr. Walter Mebane, to analyze election data.
• 📊 A key method involves creating heat maps that compare voter turnout (x-axis) against candidate vote share (y-axis) at the precinct level.
• ⚠️ In manipulated elections, such as those observed in Russia, heat maps can show a stretching effect upwards and to the right, potentially indicating ballot stuffing or other forms of manipulation.
• 📈 Conversely, a statistically normal election, exemplified by a California county won by Trump, appears more circular with no noticeable shifts based on turnout.

Findings in Key Swing States

• 📌 Analysis of Pennsylvania and North Carolina, two swing states, revealed statistical patterns deviating from expected norms.
• ⚡ The heat maps for these states showed a consistent shift towards one candidate in precincts with higher turnout, even in areas with differing political leanings.
• ⚠️ An "artificial wall" was observed around 85% turnout in Pennsylvania, suggesting potential vote stuffing up to that point, with subsequent votes possibly deleted.
• 📈 The ETA estimates that in Pennsylvania, potentially 190,000 to 210,000 votes could have been manipulated, which is enough to change the election outcome.
• 📊 Similar anomalous patterns were found in North Carolina and potentially Nevada, with flagged votes exceeding the margin of victory.

Technological Manipulation Concerns

• 💻 Taylor highlights that approximately 70% of US voting systems use similar tabulation machines, raising concerns about systemic compromise.
• 📱 The presence of cellular modems in tabulators from major voting system brands suggests a potential avenue for digital manipulation, even if systems are not directly connected to the internet.
• 🧩 The consistency and algorithmic nature of the observed anomalies point towards technological manipulation rather than isolated human errors.
• ⚙️ A comparison between machine-counted and hand-counted precincts in Minnesota showed a significant difference in vote share for Trump, with hand-counted precincts showing a lower percentage, suggesting potential vote switching in machine-counted areas.

Ongoing Investigations and Future Steps

• 🔍 The Election Truth Alliance is moving from statistical reporting to on-the-ground investigations and litigation in cases with sufficient concerns.
• ⚖️ They are preparing to file lawsuits based on their findings of potential vote manipulation.
• 🌐 The ETA makes its data and methods publicly available on their website for independent verification and analysis.
• 🗣️ Taylor asserts that current evidence points to serious concerns that the election system could have been compromised, potentially impacting not only the presidential race but also state and federal positions.