Del Bigtree on Suppressed Vaccine Study and Health Crisis in Children

The "Inconvenient Study" and Its Findings

• 🎬 Del Bigtree discusses his new film, "An Inconvenient Study," which exposes a suppressed Henry Ford Health study.
• 📊 The study reportedly compared vaccinated and unvaccinated children, revealing significantly higher rates of chronic illness among the vaccinated group.
• ⚠️ The film highlights that the study's results were allegedly suppressed due to political and pharmaceutical pressure.

Suppression of Scientific Data

• 🗣️ Bigtree states that scientists and doctors fear career threats, media smears, and pharmaceutical influence for publishing inconvenient data.
• 🔒 He recounts how Dr. Marcus Zervos, initially willing to conduct a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study, later became hesitant to publish due to fear of repercussions.
• 🎥 Hidden cameras were used to capture Zervos's admissions about the study's validity and his personal fears, forming a core part of the documentary.

Health Crisis in Children

• 📈 The U.S. is described as the "sickest country in the world," with over 54% of children now having a permanent chronic disease, a significant increase since the 1980s.
• 💉 This rise in chronic illness coincides with a dramatic increase in the number of childhood vaccines administered.
• ❓ The film questions whether the rise in chronic diseases is linked to the increasing vaccine schedule.

Call for Transparency and Action

• 📢 Bigtree advocates for government agencies like HHS to conduct large-scale vaccinated vs. unvaccinated studies to ensure vaccine safety and efficacy.
• ⚖️ He emphasizes the importance of informed consent and the right to choose vaccination, highlighting ongoing legal battles for medical freedom.
• 🌍 The film aims to raise public awareness and pressure government agencies to conduct comprehensive studies, asserting that this is a "we the people moment."

Media and Pharmaceutical Influence

• 📰 Bigtree criticizes mainstream media for being influenced by pharmaceutical money, leading to the suppression of critical scientific information.
• 🚫 He notes that figures who speak out with scientific data, like Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Peter McCullough, have faced smear campaigns and professional repercussions.
• 🏥 The documentary suggests that medical journals and boards are also influenced by pharmaceutical companies, hindering the publication of important studies.