Debunking ICE Agent Jonathan Ross's Self-Defense Claim in Renee Good's Murder

Legal Principles of Self-Defense

• 💡 Self-defense is unavailable if one creates the danger or voluntarily places themselves in a volatile situation.
• 🎯 Using excessive force, engaging in provocation, or committing a felony can also negate a self-defense claim.

Jonathan Ross's Actions and Violations

• 🎥 Ross voluntarily recorded his actions, including circling Renee Good's car, filming her dog, and her license plate.
• ⚠️ He positioned himself in front of her vehicle, directly violating ICE training and policies against doing so or firing into moving cars.
• 🔫 Ross fired three shots into her head through the windshield, with the second and third shots occurring when he was no longer in physical danger.

Evidence of Premeditation and Intent

• 💬 Renee Good was smiling and unarmed, telling Ross, "it's okay, man, I'm not mad at you," before he shot her.
• 🔥 Ross's anger at her lack of fear and his subsequent use of a slur after the shooting indicate intent and premeditation.
• 🚨 He failed to render aid after shooting and walked away, further demonstrating his state of mind.

Immunity and Prosecution

• ⚖️ Qualified immunity does not provide absolute protection from state charges, especially when an officer is breaking the law or acting unconstitutionally.
• 🏛️ Hennepin County District Attorney Mary Moriarty is collecting evidence and will indict Jonathan Ross for murder, as the federal government cannot prevent state prosecution.
• ❌ Political figures like JD Vance and Kristi Noem's arguments regarding Ross's actions and PTSD are dismissed as false and unreasonable.