Skip to main content

Big Banks Accused of Systematic Fraud in NY Foreclosure Auctions

WNYCDecember 3, 202523 min118 views
29 connections·40 entities in this video

Widespread 'Systematic Fraud' in Foreclosure Auctions

  • 🎯 An investigation by WNYC and New York Focus reveals lenders and their attorneys may be systematically defrauding homeowners in New York foreclosure auctions.
  • 💡 Lenders are accused of using a disputed method to calculate interest, inflating the amount owed by tens of thousands of dollars.
  • 🏠 This practice disproportionately affects homeowners in predominantly Black and brown neighborhoods.

The Disputed Interest Calculation Method

  • ⚖️ The core issue lies in how additional interest is calculated between the judgment amount and the actual sale of the home.
  • ⚠️ Instead of applying interest to the remaining loan balance, lenders allegedly apply it to the higher judgment amount, which is considered illegal compound interest on residential loans in New York.
  • 💰 This inflated calculation means former homeowners receive significantly less money from the sale of their homes.

Impact on Homeowners

  • 💔 Barbara Small, a homeowner in Brooklyn, lost her house to foreclosure and received approximately $100,000 less than she should have due to this calculation method.
  • 📈 In over 400 cases reviewed, homeowners like Small were shortchanged, potentially losing tens of thousands of dollars each.
  • ⚠️ Furthermore, inflated debt figures could be reported to the IRS, wrongly increasing homeowners' tax liabilities.

Legal Challenges and Systemic Issues

  • 🔍 Attorney Mark Anderson has filed lawsuits accusing lenders and law firms of this practice, alleging it's happening on a systemic level.
  • 📜 State law explicitly prohibits charging compound interest on residential loans, and court guidance supports calculating interest on the unpaid mortgage amount, not the judgment amount.
  • 🏛️ Despite clear guidance, some law firms dispute the interpretation, leading to inconsistency in how foreclosures are handled based on the lender's chosen law firm.

Referee and Court System Oversight

  • 🧐 Referees, appointed by judges to oversee foreclosure sales, are responsible for vetting the numbers, but court records suggest a lack of thorough scrutiny.
  • 🤝 Many referees are politically connected attorneys, raising concerns about patronage within the judicial system and potential conflicts of interest.
  • ❓ The Office of Court Administration could issue explicit rules to clarify the correct calculation method, but has cited ongoing litigation as a reason for not commenting.

Potential Fallout and Homeowner Recourse

  • 🚀 If Mark Anderson's lawsuits are successful, it could lead to a significant change in how interest is calculated in all future foreclosure cases statewide.
  • ⚖️ Former homeowners may have the opportunity to challenge past debts, and potentially receive triple the damages if deceptive practices are proven.
  • 🙏 Homeowners like Barbara Small are seeking accountability and hope for the return of money they believe they are rightfully owed.
Knowledge graph40 entities · 29 connections

How they connect

An interactive map of every person, idea, and reference from this conversation. Hover to trace connections, click to explore.

Hover · drag to explore
40 entities
Chapters2 moments

Key Moments

Transcript86 segments

Full Transcript

Topics15 themes

What’s Discussed

Foreclosure AuctionsSystematic FraudInterest CalculationCompound InterestNew York State LawHomeowner RightsLender PracticesLegal LoopholesForeclosure ProcessSurplus FundsDeceptive PracticesRICO StatutesFair Debt Collection Practices ActRefereesOffice of Court Administration
Smart Objects40 · 29 links
People· 9
Events· 6
Companies· 9
Locations· 3
Media· 1
Products· 7
Concepts· 5