Skip to main content

College Football Playoff Expansion: AQ Model vs. 5+11 Format Debate

Josh Pate's College Football ShowJune 5, 202521 min21,065 views
29 connections·40 entities in this video→

The CFP Expansion Conundrum

  • πŸ’‘ The College Football Playoff (CFP) expansion is imminent, with debates centering on formats beyond 2025.
  • 🎯 A key discussion point is the AQ (Automatic Qualifier) model versus the 5 plus 11 model.
  • πŸ” There's a concern that discussions are too focused on the format itself, rather than the core values of college football.

Advocating for the AQ Model

  • πŸš€ The speaker strongly advocates for a 14-team AQ model (4-4-2-2-1-1 structure) over a 16-team version or the 5+11 model.
  • πŸ”‘ The AQ model is argued to create maximum urgency in every regular season game and emphasize conference races.
  • 🎯 It ensures teams must earn their playoff spot on the field, with no guaranteed spots for individual teams, only for conferences.
  • ⚠️ In contrast, the 5+11 model, which guarantees conference spots and includes at-large bids, is criticized for diminishing the importance of regular season games and conference championships.

Critiquing the 5+11 Model

  • πŸ“‰ The 5 plus 11 model is seen as detrimental, potentially allowing teams with losses to still make the playoff without needing to win crucial late-season games.
  • πŸ“Š Evidence from the previous season is cited, where the 5+11 model would have sent six SEC teams to the playoff, even in a down year for the conference.
  • 🚫 This model is also criticized for potentially disadvantaging teams from smaller conferences like the Big 12, which has supported the 5+11 format despite potential self-detriment.

Preserving Regular Season Importance

  • πŸ“ˆ The AQ model, with potential subcommittee seeding within conferences, aims to maximize the importance of out-of-conference games and account for schedule strength.
  • 🎯 This approach ensures that even with large conference sizes, committees can consider schedule disparities when seeding teams for the playoff.
  • 🧠 The core argument is to define what fans love about college football first, then determine the format that best preserves those elements, rather than starting with a format and trying to fit values into it.

Addressing Misconceptions

  • πŸ—£οΈ The speaker addresses the perception that the AQ model is about guaranteed spots for teams, clarifying it guarantees spots for conferences, not individual teams.
  • 🚫 Proposals for smaller playoff fields like 8 or 6 teams are deemed unrealistic due to the lack of consensus among necessary parties.
  • 🧩 The current 12-team model is seen as a fallback if no agreement is reached, highlighting the frustration and importance of the ongoing debate.
Knowledge graph40 entities Β· 29 connections

How they connect

An interactive map of every person, idea, and reference from this conversation. Hover to trace connections, click to explore.

Hover Β· drag to explore
40 entities
Chapters10 moments

Key Moments

Transcript80 segments

Full Transcript

Topics13 themes

What’s Discussed

College Football PlayoffCFP ExpansionAQ Model5+11 ModelConference RacesRegular Season UrgencyPlayoff SeedingSECBig TenBig 12ACCAutomatic QualifiersAt-Large Bids
Smart Objects40 Β· 29 links
EventΒ· 1
CompaniesΒ· 20
ConceptsΒ· 15
PeopleΒ· 3
MediaΒ· 1