NJ Lawmaker Calls Abolishing ICE 'Ridiculous,' Cites Violent Criminals

Opposition to Abolishing ICE

• 💡 Congressman Jeff Van Drew dismisses the idea of abolishing ICE as ridiculous.
• 🎯 He argues that federal law enforcement is necessary in cities where violent criminals are allowed to roam freely.

Blame and Sanctuary Policies

• 🎯 Sanctuary states and cities are blamed for enabling law-breaking and protecting illegal immigrants, particularly those guilty of violent crimes.
• ⚠️ The congressman questions whether any resident would want dangerous criminals in their neighborhood.

Nature of Protests

• ⚠️ Van Drew characterizes some protests as not being peaceful, citing the presence of 9-millimeter weapons and professional-grade gas masks.
• 🎭 He contrasts this with the behavior expected in a normal neighborhood during such events, where cooperation or neutrality is typical.

Societal and Financial Impact

• 🎭 The congressman suggests these actions aim to change the fabric of America.
• 💰 He highlights the significant financial cost associated with managing these situations, including law enforcement expenses, funded by taxpayer dollars.
• 🇺🇸 Van Drew expresses a desire for a return to a time when all cities were safe and free from the presence of roaming violent criminals.