College Football Playoff Expansion: Merit vs. Capability

The Merit vs. Capability Debate

• 🎯 Josh Pate argues that his college football worldview prioritizes earned merit over potential capability when considering playoff expansion.
• 💡 He believes the regular season's impact should be maximized, contrasting with a "pro sports-minded" approach that focuses solely on the playoff.
• 🧠 While acknowledging the playoff's appeal, Pate emphasizes that the 12 Saturdays of the regular season are the true pinnacle of college football for him.

Counterarguments to Expansion

• 🚫 The argument that an expanded playoff has been "amazing" is countered by the concern that it diminishes the value of the regular season.
• 📉 The principle of scarcity is used to explain that more playoff spots reduce the value of making the playoff, akin to printing more money.
• 🏈 Pate asserts that the current system already provides plenty of football, and further expansion at the expense of the regular season is undesirable.

Proposed Changes if Expansion Occurs

• 🏟️ If the CFP expands, Pate requests two rounds of playoff games be played on home campuses to reduce excessive travel for teams and fans.
• 🗓️ He also calls for a reformatting of the schedule to avoid long delays before the national championship game, suggesting the season should conclude around New Year's Day.
• 🤝 A bold suggestion is made to collaborate with the NFL to potentially gain concessions, given the favors college football does for the league in player development.