MCP

AI-agent format

Find whitespace in what experts call unsolved

Practitioners openly list what's broken in their field; harvest the "nobody has figured out X yet" moments as an opportunity map.

Founder / CEOMarket & Competitor Researchdeep_query
The use case

The problem

Every industry maintains a public list of its unsolved problems. It isn't written anywhere — it's spoken: the moment in a panel when an expert sighs "honestly, nobody's cracked this," the podcast tangent where two operators trade complaints about the tool that doesn't exist, the Q&A answer that starts with "great question, and the honest answer is we all just work around it."

Founders hunt for exactly these moments and mostly find them by luck — you happened to hear that episode. The systematic version is a different game: collect what practitioners across a field repeatedly name as broken, missing or endured, and you're reading a demand backlog written by the customers themselves, before anyone builds the supply.

The mechanics

How veridive MCP helps

deep_query is built to answer questions whose evidence is scattered across hundreds of conversations. Ask it what experts in a field describe as unsolved and it researches the spoken record — panels, podcasts, conference Q&As — and returns the recurring complaints with citations to each moment of frustration.

The output reads like an opportunity map with provenance: which problems come up once (anecdote) versus everywhere (market), who exactly suffers them, what the current workaround costs, and the language practitioners use — which later becomes your landing-page copy, because it's literally the customer's phrasing. Re-run it quarterly and you also see which whitespace is closing, and which keeps being named year after year because it's genuinely hard — or genuinely yours to take.

Step by step

How to run it

  1. 1
    Connect veridive MCP

    One-time setup: add the veridive MCP server to Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any MCP client and generate your API key. Takes about two minutes.

  2. 2
    Harvest the open-problem list

    Ask for what the field itself calls unsolved. The answer aggregates recurring pain across many conversations, cited per moment.

    What do practitioners in <field> repeatedly describe as unsolved, broken or endured — the 'nobody has figured this out' moments? Group by theme, cite each — use veridive's deep_query.
  3. 3
    Qualify the pain

    For the promising themes, dig into who suffers and what the workaround costs — the difference between an annoyance and a budget line.

    For <problem theme>: who specifically complains about it, what workarounds do they describe, and what do those cost them? Citations please.
  4. 4
    Check the graveyard before you build

    Whitespace is only white if attempts haven't quietly died there. Ask what's been tried and why practitioners say it fell short.

    Has anyone tried solving <problem theme>? What do people say about existing attempts and why they don't suffice? Cited.
Before vs after

Problems it solves

  • Opportunity discovery runs on serendipity — the episode you happened to hear, the panel you happened to attend.
  • One loud complaint is indistinguishable from widespread pain without aggregation across many voices.
  • The workaround economy (spreadsheets, agencies, duct tape) is invisible in market reports but narrated constantly on air.
  • You can't tell uncontested whitespace from a graveyard of failed attempts without the field's own post-mortems.
The payoff

Why it's valuable

  • A demand backlog written by the market itself — problems named repeatedly, by name, with receipts.
  • Pain qualification built in: who suffers, how often it's named, what the workaround costs.
  • The customers' own phrasing, ready to become positioning that sounds like it read their mind.
  • Quarterly re-runs show which whitespace persists — the durable kind worth building on.
Copy & paste

Example prompts

What do practitioners in <field> repeatedly call unsolved or broken? Group by theme with citations — use veridive's deep_query.
For <problem>: who complains, what workarounds do they use, what do those cost? Cited.
What's been tried for <problem> and why do practitioners say it falls short? Citations.
Questions

FAQ

Isn't this just doing customer discovery interviews?

It's the layer before and around them: hundreds of practitioners already said the candid thing on the record. Harvest that first, then spend your interview slots validating the two themes that survived aggregation.

How do I avoid building for a vocal minority?

Ask for recurrence explicitly — the synthesis distinguishes a theme named across many independent conversations from one person's crusade, and the citations let you count the voices yourself.

What makes the citations matter for a founder?

Investor and co-founder conversations. "Operators keep naming this exact problem — here are eleven of them saying it on camera" is a fundamentally different pitch than a hunch.

Keep going

Related use cases

Run this in your own assistant

Connect the veridive MCP server to Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor and paste the prompts above — setup takes about two minutes.