MCP
Onboard into a new industry over a weekend
Ask the naive questions at scale — grounded answers with citations build a mental map faster than any reading list.
deep_querydeep_searchThe problem
New job, new industry, two weeks until you're expected to have opinions. The standard onboarding — a reading list, some analyst reports, frantic Wikipedia — produces vocabulary without a map: you know the terms but not how the money flows, who hates whom, which "well-known truths" insiders actually dispute. The map is what makes you functional in meetings, and it normally takes months of osmosis.
The fastest mappers ask naive questions relentlessly — but there's a social budget for naivety at a new job, and it runs out. The industry's practitioners, though, have answered every naive question on the record somewhere: on podcasts, panels and explainers. Asked at scale, with no social budget at all.
How veridive MCP helps
deep_query is naive-question infrastructure: ask the things you can't keep asking colleagues — how does money actually flow in this industry? who are the real power centers? what do insiders complain about? — and get answers researched across practitioner conversations, cited to the moments, so the map you build is checkable, not vibes.
deep_search layers the curriculum on top: filtered to beginner-friendly explainers for the basics, then to podcast and interview content where operators talk shop — the register where the industry's actual texture lives. A weekend of this produces what osmosis delivers in months: not expertise, but the map — enough to know which meeting questions are smart and which reveal you haven't done the homework. Monday's version of you has done the homework.
How to run it
- 1Connect veridive MCP
One-time setup: add the veridive MCP server to Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any MCP client and generate your API key. Takes about two minutes.
- 2Ask the money-flow questions
The naive fundamentals, asked without a social budget. Citations make the answers checkable.
I'm new to the <industry> industry. How does money actually flow — who pays whom, where are the margins, who has the leverage? Grounded answer with citations — use veridive's deep_query. - 3Map the players and the tensions
Power centers, rivalries, and the disputes insiders have that outsiders don't know exist.
Who are the real power centers in <industry>, and what do practitioners argue about among themselves? What 'well-known truths' do insiders actually dispute? Cited. - 4Absorb the operator register
Shop-talk content — the vocabulary, concerns and inside jokes that mark someone who gets it.
Find podcasts where <industry> operators talk shop with each other — not explainers for outsiders — use veridive's deep_search.
Problems it solves
- Reading lists produce vocabulary without the map — terms, but not how anything actually works.
- The naive-question budget at a new job runs out long before the questions do.
- Industry texture — tensions, disputes, unwritten rules — takes months of osmosis to absorb.
- You can't tell smart meeting questions from homework-revealing ones without the map.
Why it's valuable
- Unlimited naive questions, zero social cost, answers cited for checking.
- The map — money flow, power, tensions — in a weekend instead of a quarter.
- Operator shop-talk teaches the register that marks insiders; explainers never do.
- The method reuses for every future switch, vertical, or client industry you need fast.
Example prompts
How does money actually flow in <industry> — who pays whom, where's the leverage? Cited — use veridive's deep_query.Power centers and insider disputes in <industry>? Cited.Podcasts where <industry> operators talk shop with each other — use veridive's deep_search.FAQ
A weekend — honestly?
For the map, yes: money flow, players, tensions, vocabulary-in-register. Expertise takes the years it takes — but the map is what meetings run on, and it's what this compresses.
How do I know the answers reflect the industry, not one loud voice?
Ask for the disagreement explicitly and read the citations — the synthesis distinguishes recurring practitioner views from one person's crusade, and you can count the voices yourself.
Does this work for consultants and investors covering a new vertical?
It's arguably built for them — the weekend-map problem recurs every engagement. Same three passes, different industry each time.
Related use cases
Ask one question — "is this market saturated?" — and get a grounded answer built from what practitioners actually say, with timestamped citations.
Level and density filters separate real teaching from engagement bait; assemble a beginner→advanced path that holds up.
"Is X dead?" — get the disagreement mapped: who says yes, who says no, and the timestamped why.
Run this in your own assistant
Connect the veridive MCP server to Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor and paste the prompts above — setup takes about two minutes.