The deck is due Thursday and the material exists — that's the frustrating part. The argument you need to present is distributed across sources you've already curated: the expert talks in your library, the conference sessions you imported, the research you collected precisely because a moment like this would come. What stands between the curated material and the deck is a day of re-reading, extracting and structuring that Thursday doesn't have.

Consultants, analysts and anyone who presents for a living knows the shape: the thinking is done, the sources are gathered, and the assembly still costs the day. Assembly is the delegable part.

deep_context builds the argument from your curated sources: scope the question to the relevant imports and get the synthesis cited to the chunks — the claims, the supporting points, the expert framings, each traceable to a source you chose to trust when you curated it.

run_youtube_tool's presentation and slides handle the structural half: outlines and slide-shaped content from the source material. You assemble the final deck with judgment — order, emphasis, the client-specific frame — while the extraction and structuring that used to eat the day runs as prompts. The deck ships Thursday with citations in the appendix, which lands especially well in rooms that ask "says who?"